character alignments
Oct 3, 2014 12:23:16 GMT
Post by nazt on Oct 3, 2014 12:23:16 GMT
I want to hear what character alignments people think their characters have. This site is an excellent reference for it. You can quote the site, give your own explanation, or do both. Code below! Taken from the tracker template btw with edits. I hope the staff doesn't mind.
This really explains Brendan perfectly.
It might be more specific to say that Rikon was a Neutral Good turning to Chaotic Good. Because of his recent exposure to the nobility in Talys, he has taken a more Chaotic Good stand, willing (albeit very indecisively) to turn himself to fight the law and use underhanded means in pursuit of his goal.
Thankfully, Kamille often happens to be on the side of "good."
I thought Ibarra was a True Neutral but this just changed my mind. Captain Jack Sparrow archetype ahoy. This is so completely true what with Ibarra suddenly changing his allegiance from the royal family to the Grimleal.
Although it seems like Shamees often takes the Lawful Neutral stand, his personal feelings is that of a Lawful Good's.
On a side note, I am amused by his opposite alignment with Kamille considering how similar they are on some aspects like their professional attitude as soldiers of the military.
Sakalam has her Chaotic Evil moments but I chose Neutral Evil because Lex Luthor fits the image I had in mind.
This was pretty tough. Ptolemy is distinctly Lawful and Chaotic at the same time hence he fell in-between as a Neutral character. Although he outwardly acts like a Lawful Good character, Ptolemy follows his own code. If the law and government have gone against what he sees is right, he's out.
[div style="margin:auto;color:#ddd;width:400px;min-height:120px;background-color:#343434;border:#282828 10px solid;padding:10px;text-align:justify;font-size:11px;"][div style="font-family:courier;font-size:20px;text-align:center;padding:5px;"]ALIGNMENT[/div][img src="http://placehold.it/100x100" style="height:80px;width:80px;float:right;margin:0px 5px;opacity:0.65;border-radius:5px;"][div style="float:left;font-size:50px;font-weight:bold;padding:5px;font-family:times;height:30px;margin-top:-10px;"]‟[/div]Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan et iusto odio dignissim qui blandit praesent luptatum zzril delenit augue duis dolore te feugait nulla facilisi. Nam liber tempor cum soluta nobis eleifend option congue nihil imperdiet doming id quod mazim placerat facer possim assum. Typi non habent claritatem insitam; est usus legentis in iis qui facit eorum claritatem.
[div style="text-align:right;"]― @character[/div] [/div]
NEUTRAL GOOD
‟
I couldn't really quote anything. Tres is 13. He doesn't exactly have a personal belief he would fight for. Neutral Good is the best alignment I could give him. Over time though, I'm sure he'll fit perfectly in this alignment. Lloyd from Tales was loosely the framework I worked on for Tres. ― tres
TRUE NEUTRAL
‟
True neutral characters are concerned with their own well-being and that of the group or organization which aids them. They may behave in a good manner to those that they consider friends and allies, but will only act maliciously against those who have tried to injure them in some way. For the rest, they do not care. They do not wish ill on those they do not know, but they also do not care when they hear of evil befalling them. Better for others to suffer the evil than the true neutral and his allies. If an ally is in need, the true neutral will aid him, out of genuine love or because he may be able to count on that ally a little more in the future. If someone else is in need, they will weigh the options of the potential rewards and dangers associated with the act. If an enemy is in need, they will ignore him or take advantage of his misfortune."This really explains Brendan perfectly.
― brendan
CHAOTIC GOOD
‟
Chaotic good characters are strong individualists marked by a streak of kindness and benevolence. They believe in all the virtues of goodness and right, but they have little use for laws and regulations. They have no use for people who "try to push folk around and tell them what to do." Their actions are guided by their own moral compass which, although good, may not always be in perfect agreement with the rest of society."It might be more specific to say that Rikon was a Neutral Good turning to Chaotic Good. Because of his recent exposure to the nobility in Talys, he has taken a more Chaotic Good stand, willing (albeit very indecisively) to turn himself to fight the law and use underhanded means in pursuit of his goal.
― @rikon
LAWFUL EVIL
‟
These characters believe in using society and its laws to benefit themselves. Structure and organization elevate those who deserve to rule as well as provide a clearly defined hierarchy between master and servant. To this end, lawful evil characters support laws and societies that protect their own concerns. If someone is hurt or suffers because of a law that benefits lawful evil characters, too bad. Lawful evil characters obey the law out of fear of punishment. Because they may be forced to honor an unfavorable contract or oath they have made, lawful evil characters are usually very careful about giving their word. Once given, they break their word only if they can find a way to do it legally, within the laws of the society."Thankfully, Kamille often happens to be on the side of "good."
― kamille
CHAOTIC NEUTRAL
‟
Chaotic neutrals can also be completely random and unpredictable. They may shift allegiances at a moment's notice, or remain with a leader for years. The chaotic neutral character feels that there is no plan at all for the universe. Things just happen. They tend to believe in luck and chance, rather than fate or destiny. They don't care what happens to others, yet will not necessarily go out of their way to harm others. If someone stands in the way of their happiness, they may kill that individual or move on to something else. Their priorities tend to change as they experience new things in life. They may even appear to adhere to another alignment for some length of time, only to switch at an inappropriate moment. They can be the worst tricksters, conning people, not for gain, but for sheer amusement. The chaotic neutral may not be driven by fame or wealth, but may only take actions just to see what happens."I thought Ibarra was a True Neutral but this just changed my mind. Captain Jack Sparrow archetype ahoy. This is so completely true what with Ibarra suddenly changing his allegiance from the royal family to the Grimleal.
― ibarra
LAWFUL GOOD
‟
Lawful good can appear to be a difficult alignment to uphold, but it must be remembered that lawful good characters are not necessarily naive or unrealistic. At the heart of a lawful good alignment is the belief in a system of laws that promotes the welfare of all members of a society, ensures their safety, and guarantees justice. So long as the laws are just and applied fairly to all people, it doesn't matter to the lawful good character whether they originate from a democracy or a dictator. Though all lawful good systems adhere to the same general principles, specific laws may be different. One society may allow a wife to have two husbands, another may enforce strict monogamy. Gambling may be tolerated in one system, forbidden in another. A lawful good character respects the laws of other lawful good cultures and will not seek to impose his own values on their citizens."Although it seems like Shamees often takes the Lawful Neutral stand, his personal feelings is that of a Lawful Good's.
On a side note, I am amused by his opposite alignment with Kamille considering how similar they are on some aspects like their professional attitude as soldiers of the military.
― shamees
NEUTRAL EVIL
‟
Neutral evil characters are primarily concerned with themselves and their own advancement. They have no particular objection to working with others or, for that matter, going it on their own. Their only interest is in getting ahead. If there is a quick and easy way to gain a profit, whether it be legal, questionable, or obviously illegal, they take advantage of it. Although neutral evil characters do not have the every-man-for-himself attitude of chaotic characters, they have no qualms about betraying their friends and companions for personal gain. They typically base their allegiance on power and money, which makes them quite receptive to bribes."Sakalam has her Chaotic Evil moments but I chose Neutral Evil because Lex Luthor fits the image I had in mind.
― sakalam
NEUTRAL GOOD
‟
A neutral good character will keep his word to those who are not evil and will lie only to evil-doers. He will never attack an unarmed foe and will never harm an innocent. He will not use torture to extract information or for pleasure. He will never kill for pleasure, only in self-defense or in the defense of others. A neutral good character will never use poison. He will help those in need and works well alone or in a group. He responds well to higher authority until that authority attempts to use the law to hamper his ability to do good. He is trustful of organizations as long as they serve his utilitarian purpose. He will follow the law unless more good can come from breaking the law. He will never betray a family member, comrade, or friend. Neutral good characters are indifferent to the concepts of self-discipline and honor, finding them useful only if they promote goodness."This was pretty tough. Ptolemy is distinctly Lawful and Chaotic at the same time hence he fell in-between as a Neutral character. Although he outwardly acts like a Lawful Good character, Ptolemy follows his own code. If the law and government have gone against what he sees is right, he's out.
― @ptolemy